Comments on: Record year for AMD https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/record-year-for-amd-2026-02/ Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:25:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 https://www.electronicsweekly.com/wp-content/themes/ew/images/logo.gif Electronics Weekly https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/record-year-for-amd-2026-02/ 125 75 By: Bart Trong https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/record-year-for-amd-2026-02/#comment-1541359 Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:25:43 +0000 https://www.electronicsweekly.com/?p=888644#comment-1541359 This is a bad sign though, AMD’ entire CPU strategy is: 2 masks. 2 chip designs. Everything beyond that is conventional binnig, segmentation via included fuse circuits and advanced packaging.

This is the oldest, most obvious and predictable VLSI product design strategy and should suprise no one.

However with Threadripper AMD really “flexed” too hard, too aggressive.

$4000 gets you 32 cores, but from 2 logic dies you can never obtain the maximum memory bandwidth.

In fact, strictly speaking the 8 channel memory layout is wasted on the 32 core chip.

Need to spend $9,000 for the 64 core chip, or else you are basically excluding features

Even before the RAMPocalypse. ($3,000 for 128 GB registered ECC ram) an entry level CPU-workstation at $12,000 seems like insanity on AMDs part.

And no this has nothing to do with scarcity.

Threadripper represents the MOST MATURE end-stage of each processor revision, 2 years worth of solid yield improvements at TSMC BEFORE even shipping Acer-exclusive parts for their 1st access products

]]>